Jump to content

Talk:Gent Strazimiri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeGent Strazimiri was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 4, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 10, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 9, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gent Strazimiri, who began his career as an anti-communist activist, is now a member of the Albanian parliament for the Democratic Party of Albania?
Current status: Former good article nominee

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gent Strazimiri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: User:Vinie007

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. There are frequent places where the English seems non-standard. Phrases like "He has been from 2007 until 2009 member" or "Strazimiri finished the faculty of Law, and graduated on the University of Tirana" need to be rewritten. Also the first sentences all begin "Strazimiri is...", "He was...", "Strazimiri is...", "Stazimiri is...", "Strazimiri was...", "Strazimiri became...", etc., which could be improved a lot. I'd recommend sending this article to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section), the lede section should summarize all sections of the body. This four-sentence lede omits many sections.

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists, lists should usually be incorporated into prose, when possible. Having this many lists makes it look like a c.v. The "education" list is already in the prose, and should be removed, while the other list should be described in prose. The timeline is very good, though it should probably not be its own section.

2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Sources listed in the "References" section should be formatted in such a way that the reader can tell who created them, what the document is called, what language it's it, etc. Some sources, like this word document, cannot be verified as anything reliable without this information. You may find it helpful to use citation templates to format the sources.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). All of the important statements are sourced. But since only one of the sources is in English, I am unable to check to see whether the sources back up the statements, or whether there is close paraphrasing going on. (I have no reason to think there is; I just am not able to check.)
2c. it contains no original research. No problems with this.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. This is a very short article about an important person. As a national political figure, there has to be more material available on his background, his work in the assembly, etc.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). No problems with this.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Not long enough to have neutrality problems.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Not a problem.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. No images, so no problems.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. As a nationally recognized figure, it should be possible for someone to photograph him. There are many non-free Flickr photos, and many times the Flickr photographers can be convinced to license the photo under a free license if that means we can use the photo on Wikipedia. Even if a photo of him cannot be obtained, there could be pics of the administrative building of the the assembly, or of the district he represents, or something.
7. Overall assessment. This article does not meet GA standards at this time.

File:Gent Strazimiri.ogg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Gent Strazimiri.ogg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gent Strazimiri.ogg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gent Strazimiri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gent Strazimiri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gent Strazimiri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gent_Strazimiri&oldid=1255407911"